ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon 540
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 1024MB VRAM AMD Radeon 540 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)
AMD Radeon 540 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (24.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
344 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
AMD Radeon 540
+2737%
0.908 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Apr 2017
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
32bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
24.00GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
384
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
18.93 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.39 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
908.5 GFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
908.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
56.78 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
Lexa
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO
(215-0904018)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
