ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs ATI FireGL V8600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Lower TDP (32W vs 159W)
ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
280 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
FireGL V8600
+1275%
0.44 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
May 2007
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR4
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
320
4
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
32W
TDP
159W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
R600
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
R600 V8600
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.0
