Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2270 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

ATI FirePro 2270 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2270 and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 100W)
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
5040 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2270
0.096 TFLOPS
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation +23900%
23.04 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Mar 2023
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
40
80
Shading Units
5120
8
TMUs
160
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
96.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

15W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cedar
GPU Name
AD104
Cedar WS
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net