ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon R9 270X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 180W)
AMD Radeon R9 270X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Oct 2013
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
1280
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
84.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
168.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
180W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
Curacao
-
GPU Variant
Curacao XT
(215-0848004)
R500
Architecture
GCN 1.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.1
