ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon R7 250X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 80W)
AMD Radeon R7 250X 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (72.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Feb 2014
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
640
4
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
15.20 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
1216 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
76.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
80W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
Cape Verde
-
GPU Variant
Cape Verde XT
R500
Architecture
GCN 1.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.1
