ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA PG506 242
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 24GB VRAM PG506 242 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 165W)
NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Apr 2021
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
-
Shading Units
3584
4
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
165W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
GA100
-
-
-
R500
Architecture
Ampere
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
N/A
2.1
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
3.0
Shader Model
N/A
