Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V5600 vs Intel H3C XG310

ATI FireGL V5600 vs Intel H3C XG310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V5600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (89W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
648 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
H3C XG310 +1140%
2.381 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Nov 2020
FireGL
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
6.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

89W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
DG1
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
65 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
Unknown
153 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net