ATI FireGL V5600 vs NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 and 128MB VRAM GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V5600 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (35.20GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
104 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Lower TDP (31W vs 89W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V5600
+326%
0.192 TFLOPS
GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2
0.045 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Aug 2009
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
120
Shading Units
16
8
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
6.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
-
-
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
89W
TDP
31W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
GT218
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
GT218-200-B1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
