ATI FireGL V5600 vs AMD FirePro W600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
392 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 89W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
+300%
0.768 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Jun 2012
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
6.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
89W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
Cape Verde
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
