ATI FireGL V3600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 670 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 170W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock980MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1224 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 670
+1729%
2.634 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
May 2012
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
980 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
1344
8
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.44 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
109.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.634 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
109.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
73W
TDP
170W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
GK104
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
GK104-325-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
