ATI FireGL V3600 vs NVIDIA NVS 310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (16.00GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
72 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Lower TDP (20W vs 73W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
+44%
0.144 TFLOPS
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Jun 2012
FireGL
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
120
Shading Units
48
8
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
-
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
73W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
GF119
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
