ATI FireGL V3600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (16.00GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
264 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 73W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
+381%
0.693 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
May 2013
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
384
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.216 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.86 GTexel/s
-
-
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
692.7 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
28.86 GFLOPS
Board Design
73W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
GK208
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
GK208-301-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
