ATI FireGL V3600 vs ATI FirePro V8700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 151W)
ATI FirePro V8700 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (108.8GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
680 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
FirePro V8700
+733%
1.2 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Sep 2008
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
108.8GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
800
8
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
73W
TDP
151W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.0
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
RV770
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
(215-0669049)
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
