ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD FirePro S9150
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 235W)
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
2696 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150
+3420%
5.069 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Aug 2014
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
2816
8
TMUs
176
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS
Board Design
73W
TDP
235W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
Hawaii
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3
