ATI FireGL V3600 vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
40 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
Lower TDP (17W vs 73W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
+80%
0.144 TFLOPS
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Apr 2010
FireGL
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
80
8
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
73W
TDP
17W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
Cedar
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0
