ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD FirePro W4300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
648 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 73W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
FirePro W4300
+891%
1.428 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Dec 2015
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1428 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.28 GFLOPS
Board Design
73W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
Bonaire
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3
