Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (128GB vs 64GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 1638GB/s)
9728 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 6% (1700MHz vs 1600MHz)
Lower TDP (300W vs 2400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+131%
52.43 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI210
22.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Dec 2021
Data Center GPU
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
64GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2e
8192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
1638GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
104
-
-
-
16384
Shading Units
6656
1024
TMUs
416
0
ROPs
0
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
408 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.2 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
181.0 TFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.63 TFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.63 TFLOPS
Board Design
2400W
TDP
300W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Generation 12.5
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
6 nm
100 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
N/A
