Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
16192 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 2400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+11248%
52.43 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Nov 2008
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
1536MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
16384
Shading Units
192
1024
TMUs
64
0
ROPs
24
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
-
408 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
2400W
TDP
150W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
55 nm
100 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
