Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 97% (2050MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 211.6GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+294%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro M5000
4.252 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Jun 2015
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1950 MHz
Base Clock
861 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
211.6GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
2048
256
TMUs
128
128
ROPs
64
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
66.43 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.9 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.252 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
132.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GM204
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
GM204-875-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
