Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 4GB VRAM Tesla C1060 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
3856 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 188W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+2599%
16.79 TFLOPS
Tesla C1060
0.622 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Apr 2009
Data Center GPU
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
4096
Shading Units
240
256
TMUs
80
128
ROPs
32
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
188W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GT200B
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
