Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+64476%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 360M
0.026 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
May 2007
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
4096
Shading Units
16
256
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
17W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
G86
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
NB8M-GLM
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
80 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
