Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 108W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+764%
3.994 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Mar 2009
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
1024
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
108W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GT200B
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
G200-835-B2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
