Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro 400
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
976 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+3598%
3.994 TFLOPS
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Apr 2011
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
64bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.32GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
1024
Shading Units
48
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
108.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GT216
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GT216 GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
