NVIDIA CMP 50HX vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM CMP 50HX and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 50HX 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (560.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3544 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 50HX
+34493%
11.07 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2021
Release Date
Jan 2009
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1350 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
10GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
64bit
560.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
40
192
TMUs
4
80
ROPs
4
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
5 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
123.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
296.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
22.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.07 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
346.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
32W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x VHDCI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
RV620
TU102-100-A1
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
