NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs AMD FirePro D300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 185W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX
+249%
7.603 TFLOPS
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2021
Release Date
Jan 2014
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1470 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
162.6GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
1280
144
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.176 TFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
136.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
185W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
Pitcairn
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL
(215-0828073)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
