NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs ATI FirePro V3800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1904 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 185W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX
+1362%
7.603 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2021
Release Date
Apr 2010
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1470 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
5
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
400
144
TMUs
20
64
ROPs
8
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
185W
TDP
43W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
Redwood
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.0
