NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs ATI FirePro V3750
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (48W vs 185W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX
+2059%
7.603 TFLOPS
FirePro V3750
0.352 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2021
Release Date
Sep 2008
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1470 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
320
144
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
8
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
185W
TDP
48W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.0
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
RV730
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
RV730 PRO
(215-0719056)
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
