NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs Intel H3C XG310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (1785MHz vs 1550MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (125W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 30HX
+111%
5.027 TFLOPS
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2021
Release Date
Nov 2020
Mining GPUs
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
-
1408
Shading Units
768
88
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
125W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
DG1
TU116-100-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12 nm
Process Size
10 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
Unknown
284 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
