NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 480.4GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 9% (1531MHz vs 1410MHz)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+15%
12.63 TFLOPS
TITAN X Pascal
10.97 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Aug 2016
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
1417 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1251 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
12GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5X
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
480.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
70
SM Count
28
4480
Shading Units
3584
280
TMUs
224
128
ROPs
96
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
147.0 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
342.9 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
171.5 GFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.97 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
342.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
GP102
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
GP102-400-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
16 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
6.1
N/A
Shader Model
6.4
