NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 32GB VRAM Radeon AI PRO R9700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 644.6GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 107% (2920MHz vs 1410MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
12.63 TFLOPS
Radeon AI PRO R9700
+278%
47.84 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Jul 2025
Mining GPUs
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
1660 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
2920 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
2518 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
32GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
644.6GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
4096
280
TMUs
256
128
ROPs
128
280
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
64
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
373.8 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
747.5 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
95.68 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.84 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1495 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
300W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
Navi 48
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 48 XTW
Ampere
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
4 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
53.9 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
357 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.8
