Home GPU Comparison AMD Atari VCS 400 GPU vs AMD Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU

AMD Atari VCS 400 GPU vs AMD Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU

We compared two Game console GPUs: 4GB VRAM Atari VCS 400 GPU and 16GB VRAM Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Atari VCS 400 GPU 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 28W)
AMD Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 125% (2700MHz vs 1201MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Atari VCS 400 GPU
0.461 TFLOPS
Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU +1099%
5.53 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Dec 2020
Release Date
Jan 2025
Console GPU
Generation
Console GPU
Game console
Type
Game console
-
-
-

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
800 MHz
1201 MHz
Boost Clock
2700 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR4
Memory Type
LPDDR5X
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
1024
12
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

4.804 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
129.6 GPixel/s
14.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
922.4 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
11.06 TFLOPS
461.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.530 TFLOPS
28.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
345.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

15W
TDP
28W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Banded Kestrel
GPU Name
Strix Point
-
GPU Variant
100-000001885
GCN 5.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.5
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
4 nm
4.94 billion
Transistors
34 billion
210 mm²
Die Size
233 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net