Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
8000 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M +3092%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Mar 2009
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
24
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
192
256
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-835-B2
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
108W
900 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy