Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
Lower TDP (60W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T
+67%
13.82 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
8.253 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2021
Release Date
Unknown
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1117 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
7680
Shading Units
2560
240
TMUs
80
120
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
60W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Ampere
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
8 nm
8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
190 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.5
Shader Model
6.6
