Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
7488 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +4139%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Aug 2014
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
192
240
TMUs
16
120
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Kepler
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
35W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy