Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
6720 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K4000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +1097%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro K4000M
1.154 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
960
240
TMUs
80
120
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.02 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.08 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1154 GFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.08 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N14E-Q3-A2
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Kepler
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
100W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy