Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Boost Clock771MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T
+288%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2021
Release Date
Jul 2014
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
667 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
7680
Shading Units
2304
240
TMUs
192
120
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
150W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GK110B
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Kepler
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
6.5
Shader Model
5.1
