Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
7488 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +2891%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Nov 2008
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1536MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
24
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
192
240
TMUs
64
120
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
150W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy