Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T
13.82 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+21%
16.79 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2021
Release Date
Aug 2022
Xe Graphics
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
7680
Shading Units
4096
240
TMUs
256
120
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
500W
TDP
150W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
6 nm
8 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.6
