Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB

AI GPU We compared a Professional market GPU: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and a GPU: 80GB VRAM A800 PCIe 80 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (80GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (2039GB/s vs 1229GB/s)
Lower TDP (250W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T
13.82 TFLOPS
A800 PCIe 80 GB +41%
19.49 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Nov 2022
Xe Graphics
Generation
Ampere
Professional
Type
AI GPU
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1593 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
80GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2e
4096bit
Memory Bus
5120bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
2039GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
108
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
6912
240
TMUs
432
120
ROPs
160
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
80 MB

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
225.6 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
609.1 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
77.97 TFLOPS
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.49 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
9.746 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GA100
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Ampere
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
7 nm
8 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
250W
900 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
6.5
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy