Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
5952 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 350W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 1T +2204%
11.06 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Dec 2010
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
192
192
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
22.12 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
2.765 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Fermi
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Board Design

350W
TDP
62W
750 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy