Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 230.9GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock1569MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 350W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 1T
+37%
11.06 TFLOPS
Quadro P5200 Max Q
8.033 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2021
Release Date
Feb 2018
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1316 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1569 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
6144
Shading Units
2560
192
TMUs
160
96
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
100.4 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
251.0 GTexel/s
22.12 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
125.5 GFLOPS
11.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.033 TFLOPS
2.765 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
251.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
350W
TDP
100W
750 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GP104
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Pascal
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
16 nm
8 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.5
Shader Model
6.4
