Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A50 vs Intel H3C XG310

Intel Arc Pro A50 vs Intel H3C XG310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 52% (2350MHz vs 1550MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A50 +102%
4.813 TFLOPS
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Nov 2020
Alchemist
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
2350 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

75.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
150.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
9.626 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
4.813 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
1203 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
DG1
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
6 nm
Process Size
10 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
157 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy