Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile vs AMD FirePro A320

Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile vs AMD FirePro A320

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 88% (1800MHz vs 955MHz)
Lower TDP (28W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile +88%
1.382 TFLOPS
FirePro A320
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Jun 2012
Arc Graphics-M
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
800 MHz
1800 MHz
Boost Clock
955 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
6
384
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

14.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.640 GPixel/s
43.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.92 GTexel/s
2.765 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1382 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
733.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Meteor Lake GT1
GPU Name
Devastator
-
GPU Variant
A320
Xe-LPG
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
32 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.303 billion
Unknown
Die Size
246 mm²

Board Design

28W
TDP
100W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy