Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 96GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 4.10GB/s)
Lower TDP (30W vs 1000W)
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1837MHz vs 1750MHz)
More VRAM (96GB vs 4GB)
16128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A310
2.688 TFLOPS
B200 SXM 192 GB +2209%
62.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Jan 2024
Alchemist
Generation
Tesla Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1750 MHz
Base Clock
1665 MHz
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
96GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM3e
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
4.10TB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
132
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
16896
32
TMUs
528
16
ROPs
24
96
Tensor Cores
528
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
50 MB

Theoretical Performance

28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
GB100
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Blackwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
5 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
208 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

30W
TDP
1000W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
9.0
6.6
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy