AMD Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
14208 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 760W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300A
+21333%
122.6 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2023
Release Date
Jun 2012
Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM3
Memory Type
DDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
228
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
14592
Shading Units
384
880
TMUs
32
0
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
980.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
122.6 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
61.3 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS
Board Design
760W
TDP
55W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
MI300
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
146 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
