AMD Instinct MI300A vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 1229GB/s)
6912 additional rendering cores
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Lower TDP (500W vs 760W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300A
+787%
122.6 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
13.82 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2023
Release Date
Jan 2021
Instinct
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM3
Memory Type
HBM2e
8192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
228
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
14592
Shading Units
7680
880
TMUs
240
0
ROPs
120
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
980.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
122.6 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
61.3 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS
Board Design
760W
TDP
500W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MI300
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
5 nm
Process Size
10 nm
146 billion
Transistors
8 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.5
