Home GPU Comparison AMD AeroBox GPU vs ATI Xbox 360 GPU 65nm

AMD AeroBox GPU vs ATI Xbox 360 GPU 65nm

We compared two Game console GPUs: 8GB VRAM AeroBox GPU and 512MB VRAM Xbox 360 GPU 65nm to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD AeroBox GPU 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock985MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.22GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
656 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AeroBox GPU +635%
1.765 TFLOPS
Xbox 360 GPU 65nm
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2020
Release Date
Aug 2008
Console GPU
Generation
Console GPU
Game console
Type
Game console
-
Bus Interface
-

Clock Speeds

935 MHz
Base Clock
-
985 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1066 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.22GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
14
Compute Units
3
896
Shading Units
240
56
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

15.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
55.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.000 GTexel/s
3.530 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.765 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
110.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Kryptos
GPU Name
Xenos Jasper
-
GPU Variant
Crayola 6
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
65 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.232 billion
Unknown
Die Size
121 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
N/A
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy