NVIDIA A2 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A2 and 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 250W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 44% (2550MHz vs 1770MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 200.1GB/s)
11520 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
A2
4.531 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+1340%
65.28 TFLOPS
Blender
A2
902
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+566%
6013
Graphics Card
Nov 2021
Release Date
Aug 2023
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1440 MHz
Base Clock
1155 MHz
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
200.1GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
10
SM Count
100
1280
Shading Units
12800
40
TMUs
400
32
ROPs
176
40
Tensor Cores
400
10
RT Cores
100
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
56.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
448.8 GPixel/s
70.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1020 GTexel/s
4.531 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
65.28 TFLOPS
4.531 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
65.28 TFLOPS
70.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1020 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102
Ampere
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
76.3 billion
Unknown
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
