Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A2 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

NVIDIA A2 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A2 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (60W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 200.1GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A2
4.531 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2 +76%
7.987 TFLOPS
A2
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Mar 2016
Quadro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1440 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
200.1GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

10
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
1280
Shading Units
4096
40
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
40
Tensor Cores
-
10
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

56.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
70.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
4.531 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.531 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
70.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
Capsaicin
-
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
8.9 billion
Unknown
Die Size
596 mm²

Board Design

60W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy