NVIDIA A2 vs ATI FireGL V3600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A2 and 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.1GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1160 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 73W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
A2
+3046%
4.531 TFLOPS
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2021
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1440 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
200.1GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
3
10
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
120
40
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
40
Tensor Cores
-
10
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
56.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
70.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
4.531 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.531 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
70.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
60W
TDP
73W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
RV630
-
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.39 billion
Unknown
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
